On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 22:00, fantasai wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/ > > Not entirely sure what this is or who I should be contacting, > but I think rel="details" would be better expressed as > rev="abstract" (or rev="description", to keep with the RSS > terminology). If I'm understanding the RSS correctly, the > linked document is not details but the actual thing being > described in the 'item'. Hmm... interesting point. Since the main place where this matters is our homepage, I've taken the liberty of copying site-comments, which has a public archive. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/ I presume you don't mind. Ah... in fact, I see that you already particpate in W3C mailing lists with public archives... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Nov/0148.html > ~fantasai -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 11:52:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:23:05 GMT