Re: Is scalability the key property of knowlege graph?

Le jeu. 13 juin 2019 à 07:40, 我 <1047571207@qq.com> a écrit :

> Dear all:
>
> When I first touch knowledge graph, I'm very confused. Different from the
> other AI theory,  it is not an pattern recognization algorithm which will
> give some "output" given some "input"(such as classify algorithms) ,but a
> program language(such as owl,rdf) and database(such as neo4j) instead.
>

It seems to me wordnet is knowledge graph, conceptnet is knowledge graph
same for wikidata. Those are refined data that is related together. I
consider basic SPARQL to be a pattern recognizer.


> So in my opinion, knowledge graph is more like a problem of engineering than
> mathematic theory.
>

Maybe not a mathematic theory, but still much paper has been printed on the
subject (semantic network, multinet, framenet), so I would not consider the
theory of knowledge graphs settled.

>
> Then I realized that different from the pattern recognization algorithm,
>



> the knowledge graph is created aimed at making the computes all over the
> world to  communicate with each other with a common language, and I have
> a question: Is scalability the key property of knowledge graph?
>

It depends on your scale. Otherwise how many users are you serving? What
kind of computation your are processing?


> There are many knowledge vaults edited by different language(such as
> owl,rdf ),but is it always hard to merge them and there is not a standard
> knowledge vault  on which  we can do advanced  development. So is it
> necessary to open a scalable  and standard knowledge vault so that
> everyone can keep extended it and make it more perfect just like linux
> kernel or  wiki pedia? What kind of knowledge should be contained in the standard
> knowledge vault so that it can be universal?
>

Some Desktop environment have create languages used by application to
interop the way you describe. It not world wide scale but still a good
example of how to create application that communicates between them to
create more value.

I imagine that the standard knowledge vault is an originator, and all of
> the other application copy the originator, then all of the other
> application can communicate under the same
>

I think multinet describe very well this idea of "knowledge vault" for
applications of natural language processing.


> common sense, for example when a application decelerate ''night", all of
> the other application will know it's dark.
>
> As I know, the knowlege graph is implement as a query service, but is it
> possible to implement it  as a program language,just like c++,java? In this
> way ,the compute can directly know nature language, and human can
> communicate with compute with nature language, also a compute can communicate with
> another compute with nature language.
>

This reminds me of this recent article about Natural Langue Interfaces to
Database Systems http://wp.sigmod.org/?p=2897