- From: Florian Kleedorfer <florian.kleedorfer@austria.fm>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:33:44 +0100
- To: Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>
Am 2017-11-16 23:40, schrieb Sebastian Samaruga: > I regret 'cos my level of academic parlance or politenes is low but > maybe this could help: to devise a 'dialog like' protocol which, with > kind of placeholders, could help metamodels (ontologies) to > 'negotiate' (message based functional activation) each other contents. I am not sure if I understand you correctly, but I think that is what we want to achieve. In my words, Agents state their goals/interests and constraints on possible solutions. Based on this information they are matched by 3rd parties. Some matched agents decide to start a conversation (aiming to reach their respective goal). They see the information (triples) provided by their counterparts and try to integrate it with their own information (triples). If they manage, the resulting data structure describes a solution to both agent's goals and can be made the content of an agreement. If the integration of information into one data structure fails (the constraints of one of the agents are not met), information can be changed or added as the conversation continues, until at some point the integration succeeds. > It is briefly described in this very early / incomplete draft (I'm > also sending it as an attachment). It's a very 'amateur' view of a > (mostly) Semantic Web hobbyist: > > https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics/blob/master/Document.pdf?raw=true > > Best, > Sebastián Samaruga > --- > http://exampledotorg.blogspot.com.ar
Received on Friday, 17 November 2017 11:34:28 UTC