W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2016

Re: Transparent and/or anonymous attribution in scholarly communication

From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 08:03:34 -0800
To: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f92c9fad-1c48-e074-cff4-f538bd3673fe@ucsb.edu>
Hmm, can you clarify the relation between your post on academic 
reviewing styles and the topic of this (technical) Semantic Web mailing 
list?

On 11/09/2016 03:08 AM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
> "
> In scholarly articles and peer-reviews, the attribution for authors 
> and reviewers should be transparent (t) and/or anonymous (a)
>
> A. (t) authors (t) reviewers
> B. (t) authors (a) reviewers
> C. (a) authors (t) reviewers
> D. (a) authors (a) reviewers
> "
>
> https://twitter.com/Linked_Research/status/796297292731084801
>
> Poll closes in 6 days. I'm curious to see and happy to share the 
> results (for whatever it is of worth).
>
> If you don't use Twitter or don't wish to vote, your feedback is 
> appreciated here just as well.
>
> -Sarven
> http://csarven.ca/#i
>


-- 
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2016 16:04:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 9 November 2016 16:04:13 UTC