Re: Semantic Business Intelligence from Wouter Beek on 2015-06-27 (semantic-web@w3.org from June 2015)

From: Wouter Beek <w.g.j.beek@vu.nl>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:07:15 +0200
To: Sebastian Samaruga <cognescent@gmail.com>
Cc: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "pragmaticweb@lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de" <pragmaticweb@lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de>, "topicmapmail@infoloom.com" <topicmapmail@infoloom.com>, "fca-list@cs.uni-kassel.de" <fca-list@cs.uni-kassel.de>, "sw-announce@semanticplanet.com" <sw-announce@semanticplanet.com>, "data-mining@googlegroups.com" <data-mining@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <CAE1un7NJtLLZgm+5JXFXsVbCdyXrdYW5dKFk1nnNuC5=bW4umw@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Sebastian,

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Sebastian Samaruga <cognescent@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 'arithmetic' inference

I'm not sure what this is.

In your PDF document you state that: "If a set of Subjects share the same
set of Predicates the resulting set
could be regarded as an 'inferred' same type."

This definition of "same type" is flawed since according to it `ex:a` in
[1] and `ex:b` in [2] would have the same type:

[1]   ex:a rdf:type ex:Apple .
[2]   ex:b rdf:type ex:Pear  .

Would it not be more accurate to describe what you want to do as
_classification_?

---
Best regards!,
Wouter Beek.

E-mail: w.g.j.beek@vu.nl
WWW: www.wouterbeek.com
Tel.: 0647674624

Received on Saturday, 27 June 2015 07:08:22 UTC