W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > June 2015

Re: Semantic Business Intelligence

From: Wouter Beek <w.g.j.beek@vu.nl>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:07:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE1un7NJtLLZgm+5JXFXsVbCdyXrdYW5dKFk1nnNuC5=bW4umw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Samaruga <cognescent@gmail.com>
Cc: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "pragmaticweb@lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de" <pragmaticweb@lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de>, "topicmapmail@infoloom.com" <topicmapmail@infoloom.com>, "fca-list@cs.uni-kassel.de" <fca-list@cs.uni-kassel.de>, "sw-announce@semanticplanet.com" <sw-announce@semanticplanet.com>, "data-mining@googlegroups.com" <data-mining@googlegroups.com>
​Dear Sebastian,​

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Sebastian Samaruga <cognescent@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 'arithmetic' inference

​I'm not sure what this is.

In your PDF document you state that: "If a set of Subjects share the same
set of Predicates the resulting set
could be regarded as an 'inferred' same type."​

This definition of "same type" is flawed since according to it `ex:a` in
[1] and `ex:b` in [2] would have the same type:

[1]   ex:a rdf:type ex:Apple .
[2]   ex:b rdf:type ex:Pear  .

Would it not be more accurate to describe what you want to do as
_classification_?

---
Best regards!,
Wouter Beek.

E-mail: w.g.j.beek@vu.nl
WWW: www.wouterbeek.com
Tel.: 0647674624
Received on Saturday, 27 June 2015 07:08:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:43:00 UTC