W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2014

Re: RDF constraint language (was Re: An alternative RDF)

From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:34:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMVTWDxnhtkmRNiHJdOmFPu=zDpFAPajLY4gq-T+UwUrtMnsYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Cc: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
I assume this work is relevant to this topic:

http://www2.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~mschmidt/docs/cold13_rdd.pdf
http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jperez/amw2014/paper_6.pdf

Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> Just to jump in on this...
>
> On 10/07/2014 03:58, Juan Sequeda wrote:
> [..]
>
>  Are you looking for something like Integrity Constraints ala relational
>> world? If so, then RDF as-is is not the tool for you. I know that there
>> are
>> some extensions that do support integrity constraints in RDF:
>> http://docs.stardog.com/icv/--
>>
>
> We (W3C) are close to seeking member approval for a new WG that will
> define a standard for just such a constraint language. Nothing definite yet
> but hopes are high that the draft charter at
> http://www.w3.org/2014/rds/charter will be taken up. That document links
> to some member submissions that are helping to drive the conversation.
>
> The doc also includes a link to the mailing list where it's being
> discussed.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil.
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 18:35:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:52 UTC