W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2014

Re: RDF constraint language (was Re: An alternative RDF)

From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:13:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE35VmyJdKmantjitmkyieHUVzPPJS9Fq7zpjhzr9KijWGPFPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Cc: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Phil, in that case why are SPIN constraints not included? It's a
member submission.
http://spinrdf.org/spin.html#spin-constraints

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
> Just to jump in on this...
>
> On 10/07/2014 03:58, Juan Sequeda wrote:
> [..]
>
>> Are you looking for something like Integrity Constraints ala relational
>> world? If so, then RDF as-is is not the tool for you. I know that there
>> are
>> some extensions that do support integrity constraints in RDF:
>> http://docs.stardog.com/icv/--
>
>
> We (W3C) are close to seeking member approval for a new WG that will define
> a standard for just such a constraint language. Nothing definite yet but
> hopes are high that the draft charter at
> http://www.w3.org/2014/rds/charter will be taken up. That document links to
> some member submissions that are helping to drive the conversation.
>
> The doc also includes a link to the mailing list where it's being discussed.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil.
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 11:14:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:52 UTC