W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2013

Re: AW: ORG implementations

From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:40:24 +0000
Message-ID: <5278BD08.9010600@gmail.com>
To: "Klee, Carsten" <Carsten.Klee@sbb.spk-berlin.de>
CC: "Heise, Andreas" <Andreas.Heise@sbb.spk-berlin.de>, "Rolschewski, Johann" <Johann.Rolschewski@sbb.spk-berlin.de>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi Carsten,

Thanks very much for this report, which I've added to record at [1].

Dave

[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Implementations

On 05/11/13 06:45, Klee, Carsten wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> the German ISIL- and Library Codes Agency at the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin is planning to use the Organization Ontology for its address database of Libraries, Archives, Museums and related Organisations [1].
>
> We're planning to use the following terms:
>
> Organization
> OganizationalUnit
> OrganizationalCollaboration
> Site
> hasUnit
> hasSite
> siteAddress
> linkedTo
> classification
>
> The class ChangeEvent and the properties originalOrganization and resultedFrom are also applicable to our data, but it's not clear if we're going to use them.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carsten
>
> [1] <http://sigel.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/suche/linked-data-service/>
> _______________________________________________
> Carsten Klee
> Abt. Überregionale Bibliographische Dienste IIE
> Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz
>
> Fon:  +49 30 266-43 44 02
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Dave Reynolds [mailto:dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Montag, 4. November 2013 16:22
>> An: semantic-web@w3.org
>> Betreff: ORG implementations
>>
>> The W3C GLD working group is discussing the status of the Organization
>> Ontology [1] which is currently a Candidate Recommendation.
>>
>> While there is evidence of usage [2] we cannot yet meet the CR exit
>> criteria for all the terms in the ontology. The group will need to
>> decide within the next two weeks what to do about this (options include
>> alternative publication tracks).
>>
>> If you have, or are planning, a use of the ORG ontology and have not yet
>> reported it to the working group then please could you do so over the
>> next two weeks letting us know at least which terms you have used. If
>> you plan a report but cannot make that timescale then please contact us.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Implementations
>
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 09:40:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:46 UTC