W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2013

Re: SPIN prospects

From: (wrong string) čius <martynas@graphity.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:23:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE35VmyfvV6yt8qpZS862wshc8jG2YFMMsycYSvBSwUu6gWXtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hey all,

Graphity [1] is using SPIN templates for SPARQL queries that get
attached to ontology classes and are used to query page contents.
Queries can also be built on-the-fly using a query builder that uses
SPIN API behind the scenes [2].


[1] https://github.com/Graphity/graphity-ldp
[2] https://github.com/Graphity/graphity-ldp/blob/master/src/main/java/org/graphity/util/QueryBuilder.java

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Does anyone know if the SPIN submission [1] is likely to get any further
> attention and possibly move onto a standards track?
> The W3 acknowledgement [2] indicated it might be taken up by the RIF
> working group.
> Before I recently found SPIN, I was about to implement some of
> capabilities independently, since my use of SPARQL requires templating,
> constraint definition, API documentation, and rule interoperability.
> Quite by accident I saw a reference to SPIN and realized it would meet
> many of my needs. I'm wondering how others have gotten very far with
> SPARQL without using something like SPIN, and if the further development
> of SPIN towards a W3C recommendation would advance the use of SPARQL.
> Regards,
> --Paul
> [1] SPARQL Inferencing Notation, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/02/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/02/Comment/
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 13:24:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:39 UTC