- From: Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:45:08 -0600
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Does anyone know if the SPIN submission [1] is likely to get any further attention and possibly move onto a standards track? The W3 acknowledgement [2] indicated it might be taken up by the RIF working group. Before I recently found SPIN, I was about to implement some of capabilities independently, since my use of SPARQL requires templating, constraint definition, API documentation, and rule interoperability. Quite by accident I saw a reference to SPIN and realized it would meet many of my needs. I'm wondering how others have gotten very far with SPARQL without using something like SPIN, and if the further development of SPIN towards a W3C recommendation would advance the use of SPARQL. Regards, --Paul [1] SPARQL Inferencing Notation, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/02/ [2] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/02/Comment/
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 03:46:00 UTC