W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Is there a dictionary to declare constraints on data ? (like in forms, not in ontologies...)

From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:00:52 -0500
Cc: semantic-web@w3c.org
Message-Id: <B46A58C5-2AA9-4354-B266-7588FEB3BD3B@ebusiness-unibw.org>
To: Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@deri.org>
Yes, SPIN:




On Jan 24, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:

> Hi,
> I need to declare, for a given RDF input action, a set of constraints that must be met in order for the operation to be successful.
> Basically it's like in a form, I need a dictionary to specify that, for instance, a single value needs to be provided for a given properties.
> This has nothing to do with the ontological representation of the domain and with inference behind.
> For instance I may want to say that for the property hasAddress one and only one address for each person must be presented in a message/form to be valid. But this is just my input requirement, ontology-wise a person can have as many addresses as he/she wants (including none).
> Now, is there a dictionary that people is using to declare these kind of constraints ? It seems feasible to embed in it bits of sparql to automate validation.
> best,
> Andrea

martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 01:01:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:39 UTC