- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:36:04 -0400
- To: "Sampo Syreeni" <decoy@iki.fi>, "Semantic Web List" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Sampo, Check out http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/d2rq/ and http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/. Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: decoy@kapsi.fi [mailto:decoy@kapsi.fi] On Behalf Of Sampo Syreeni > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 3:57 AM > To: Semantic Web List > Subject: relational data as a bona fide member of the SM > > As a relational minded guy, I wonder why there aren't any genuinely > relational minded formats/syntaxes/data around, which still embody the > SemWeb/LinkedData mindset. I mean, that ought to be pretty easy to do, > and it then ought to bring all of the benefits which once made RM so > great and overpowering. > > Why precisely do all of the semweb formats stay ternary, thereby > forcing > themselves to reify any higher arity, and as such complicate the > processing of higher arity data by adding an extra reification layer? > -- > Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - decoy@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front > +358-50-5756111, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2 >
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 16:39:06 UTC