W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Any objections against using xsd:anySimpleType or rdfs:Literal as the rdfs:range for OWL datatype properties?

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:43:36 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTikC8ozqq=6TmBjru2hwG7PpxqdqsaSMuE-d3fk6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net> wrote:

> I am a bit confused now, does this mean that a property with a range of
> xsd:duration can't be a owl:DatatypeProperty? (e.g., it's a fundamental
> datatype for signal processing modeling)

That's correct, for OWL DL. If you have some examples of how you might
reason with durations, I might be able to suggest methods of doing so
within bounds of what is allowable with OWL DL.


> Cheers,
> Bob
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2010 16:12:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:22 UTC