W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2010

Re: Representing vCard Objects in RDF (W3C Member Submission)

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:17:44 +0000
Message-ID: <b3be92a01002101517y77b8002fm9f6381afbef2022@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Peterson <publicayers@verizon.net>
Cc: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>, public-xg-socialweb@w3.org, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Brian Peterson
<publicayers@verizon.net> wrote:
> I like the updates, but I always wondered why vCard doesn't include a
> relation that maps a person/org to their vcards. Or does it and I just don't
> see it?
>
> I guess I also don't understand the approach outlined in the comments for
> VCard saying that the VCard URI could also be a URI for a person or
> organization. What's the point of having the VCard class if anything can
> have the dual role of being a vcard? I'd have thought that keeping people
> separate from vcards but providing a way of associating a person's vcards to
> themselves would result in cleaner ontologies.
>

Well, there's a difference between "clean" ontologies and what people
actually do. Peter Mika from Yahoo! could step in with actual data,
but it appears most people apply hcards and vcard properties to people
or organizations directly, without an intervening (and often blank
node) for the "card" itself.

If someone wants to make a distinction that this particular URI is
actually a "card" or a "person" they can state that using FOAF.

Also, it's much easier to query without tooooo many layers of indirection.



> Brian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Renato Iannella
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:45 PM
> To: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org; semantic-web at W3C
> Subject: Representing vCard Objects in RDF (W3C Member Submission)
>
>
> We are pleased to announce that an updated W3C Note for "Representing vCard
> Objects in RDF" is now available:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/Submission/2010/SUBM-vcard-rdf-20100120
>
> This W3C Member Submission merges the original W3C Note [1] with the later
> "An ontology for vCards" [2] to produce a unified approach to RDF vCard
> expression.
>
> The W3C Team has also produced some comments on the Submission [3].
>
> Cheers...  Renato Iannella (for the Authors)
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-vcard-rdf-20010222/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns-2006.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2010/01/Comment/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 23:19:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:34 GMT