W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Playing with Pre-defined D2RQ specifications..

From: Kamler Hammez <hammezkam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:38:16 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimxJeB4y3Cbbd2Ugo+sOv9yHfwBuE=ChhqdzGiu@mail.gmail.com>
To: semantic-web@w3.org
Questions have  been answered on D2RQ's mailing list, Although if there's
any information you would share about the topic, dont hesitate!


2010/12/8 Kamler Hammez <hammezkam@gmail.com>

> Hello,
> - When applying the script : generate-mapping *,* D2RQ starts to generate
> a default mapping file, and it does allow users to provide additional
> labels, comments, and properties after this ; and apparently it is also
> possible to play with the whole mapping file.
> I wanted to know whether it's possible to do changes on those rules that
> generate the mapping file and customize them, in order to add more
> specifications on how I would like the process of the mapping will be
> executed | And to add for example such functions to the D2RQ vocabulary that
> will be applied in execution-time to filter which data or property to choose
> from the Database,  and so forth.. ?
> - Next question is whether it is possible to use the D2RQ engine separately
> of the D2R Server? Cause all I need in my case is to :  Use existing
> "rules/criteria" that do the mappings which are  defined by the "D2RQ
> language" | & to do some changes on it. Then execute it with help of the
> D2RQ engine.
> - Last: How D2RQ represent constraints that a database may contain?
> (Note: I'm aware that I should have asked at D2RQ Mailing list, I did and
> got no answer yet, hope someone explains me these questions here)
> Regards,
> Kamler Hammez

Kamler  Hammez
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 16:38:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:24 UTC