W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2009

Re: process to discover and adopt/adapt relationships

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@PioneerCA.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:32:04 -0700
Message-ID: <E9F21D1010F8414F940F6EC3DDB511A9@rhmlaptop>
To: "Pierre-Antoine Champin" <swlists-040405@champin.net>, "John Graybeal" <graybeal@mbari.org>
Cc: "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
It is quite easy to create another customized ontology by changing a few 
The mKR/mKE system (see http://mkrmke.org) has explicit commands
for doing this.

mKR/mKE is designed to handle many ontologies ("contexts").
Implementing the hierarchy with double-linked lists makes it easy
to insert and delete nodes.

Dick McCullough

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pierre-Antoine Champin" <swlists-040405@champin.net>
To: "John Graybeal" <graybeal@mbari.org>
Cc: "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: process to discover and adopt/adapt relationships

> John Graybeal wrote:
>> Even if I find a very solid ontology that meets these criteria,
>> inevitably it has more or fewer concepts than I want to show the users
>> of my ontology. So presenting just the right variation of the ontology
>> requires...another ontology. (I guess extension can be done by
>> importing, and adding the few extra terms. But subsetting seems awkward,
>> unless one can import and _deprecate_ a few terms?)
> If what you are interested in is hiding those concepts from the *users*,
> you could simply import the ontology, then use an AnnotationProperty to
> tell your application which concepts to show and which ones to hide.
> If you want to hide them from the inference engine as well, this is
> another story, because it may have some unexpected consequences. For
> example, considering the ontology:
>  Animal
>    Mammal
>      Dog
>      Cat
> if you decide that Mammal is not interesting for you, you may lose the
> relation between Animal and Dog/Cat. Note that [1] gives some
> interesting solutions to this kind of problem.
>  pa
> [1] http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11762256_21
Dick McCullough
Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 23:33:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:10 UTC