On 22/07/2009 14:32, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > > Benjamin Nowack wrote: >> Interesting. I guess this is another argument/example pro Hugh >> Glaser's idea of simply conflating resource IDs for the sake of >> "deployability". The example types <#business> as Vcard, Business >> and also as BusinessEntity which would usually be considered wrong >> RDF, but, as argued before, is more intuitive for HTML authors, >> especially if they found their way to the SemWeb through pragmatic >> solutions like microformats. We should really give this contextual >> semantics idea another thought. >> > Actually, I disagree completely. > Actually, not sure I agree either :-) Although being a little sloppy in the short term to "make the whole thing fly now" is not a bad attitude. "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."? HughReceived on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 13:53:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:44 GMT