- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:01:37 -0500
- To: paola.dimaio@gmail.com
- Cc: SWIG <semantic-web@w3.org>
On Feb 9, 2009, at 11:30 AM, paola.dimaio@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks a lot for the clarifications > I am not sure I knew that was the case > but I think I am clear with the notion of timestamp, whatever way > that is dealt with > > I presume the representation of the relationship between > these many URIs that point to the same resource (to reduce > ambiguity) should also be specified somewhere? Well, not the same *resource*; the examples illustrated two URIs that, at a given time, pointed to the same *representation*, but the URIs referred to distinct *resources*. However, yes you'd probably want to explicitly represent the fact that the various URIs that refer to, for example, "the weather in Oaxaca" at various times are all related by the fact that they're about "the weather in Oaxaca" (e.g., so you could do a historical analysis about humidity changes in Oaxaca over time). > > > thanks again > best de nada --Frank > > > PDM
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 17:02:22 UTC