- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:12:58 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>
Hi Kingsley. It is great for people to be able to find a lot of the LOD cloud at your site, but please be careful about your claims concerning the data you have crawled from LOD. To say "our actual VoiD graph for LOD cloud" is to mislead readers into thinking that it captures more than it does. Best Hugh On 28/04/2009 13:10, "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: As for the % re. FOAF, I think that can be determined from our actual VoiD graph for LOD cloud [1]. I don't know off the top of my head if FOAF is up to 50%. > > The "Linked" part of the name implies that crawling is a valid tactic > to gather the data to me. Not disputing that, just describing what we have in the instance :-) Remember, we've sponged (crawled and RDFized) data since inception of our participation in this space. Links: 1. http://lod.openlinksw.com/void/Dataset Kingsley
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 21:14:22 UTC