Jim Hendler wrote: > (note reduced cc-list, wish everyone would do that) > > Fwiw, seems to me what we need is rdfs:sameas - with owl: sameas being a > special, more restricted, case - like rdf vs owl class defs > Not in my book. We then just have to ask rdfs:sameAs owl:sameAs owl:sameAs or rdfs:sameAs rdfs:sameAs owl:sameAs ? Oh ... maybe. We might end up with a hierarchy of equivalence relations. But managing that hierarchy would be even harder than managing just one. JReceived on Friday, 16 May 2008 14:15:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:25 GMT