- From: Renato Golin <renato@ebi.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 14:12:43 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Toby Inkster wrote: > Existing taxonomy vocabs tend to follow a theme of every species requiring > a unique identifying URI. That approach is not very scalable and certainly > not memorable. If you take a look at the FlyBase vocab, the RDF schema > weighs in at over 3 MB - and that vocab only covers fruit flies! The vocab > I've written does not require species to have a unique URI - as a result > the entire spec (which includes a schema in RDFa) is 28 kB (or 50 kB if > you include the 22 kB RDF/XML alternative schema as well). Yeah, I got that... You could make a list of compatibilities (using sameAs) to most important ontologies to make them even more compatible. I do have some further questions... Plain text for divisions can lead to spell problems (not only caps) and the information won't be wrong, but also putting all species names in a list is not possible. How would you address that? In Authority you state what I got as the citation. Will you link to any journal database or have a local citation list? Just saying "Linnaeus, 1758" is not enough for most cases. cheers, --renato -- Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm
Received on Friday, 9 May 2008 13:13:22 UTC