W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2008

RE: [ontolog-forum] Last call documents for OWL 2 specificationavailable - review and comments solicited

From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:03:11 +0100
Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0EA6EDE@judith.fzi.de>
To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>, "SW-forum" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Cc: "Azamat" <abdoul@cytanet.com.cy>, "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Dear all!

I just noticed that the original mail by Alan Ruttenberg contained a wrong
link, pointing to a now obsolete set of older working drafts. 

Here is the correct link to the current set of OWL 2 working drafts (with
some of them being marked as "last call" working drafts, as announced by
Alan):

 
<http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2008/12/03/eleven_w3c_publications_related_to_owl
_2>

Regards,
Michael

PS: I don't know whether I am allowed to post to the ontolog-forum, so maybe
someone is willing to forward this mail?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org]
>On Behalf Of Azamat
>Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 5:33 PM
>To: [ontolog-forum]
>Cc: 'SW-forum'
>Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Last call documents for OWL 2
>specificationavailable - review and comments solicited
>
>
>Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:14 AM, Alan wrote:
>"I am looking for comments on all aspects of the specification, and in
>particular comments as to how understandable the specification is, any
>comments on new features, as well as any inconsistencies or errors."
>
>Just some short comments to some key OWL2 claims:
>1. Partiality. The data type model, the logical basis of OWL 2,
>seemingly
>pasted from Motik's paper, is too partial and too formal and too
>logical, no
>real semantic functions and corresponding rules, See Reality, Universal
>Ontology...;
>2. Misplacement of categories, the logical entities for the ontological
>entities. See Ontopaedia."OWL 2 allows for annotations of ontologies,
>ontology entities (classes, properties, and individuals), anonymous
>individuals, axioms, and other annotations. Annotations of all these
>types,
>however, have no semantic meaning in OWL 2 and are ignored in this
>document
>(Direct Semantics). http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-semantics-
>20081008/
>3. Inconsistency. "OWL 2 ontologies consist of the following three
>different
>syntactic categories: entities (classes, properties, individuals), class
>expressions, axioms. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-syntax-20081008/
>
>I haven't read all the sequel but have an impression that OWL 0 was
>tended
>to be more consistent and comprehensive and less formal logical. It is
>good
>to remember that the SW is a web of data about the world, and that the
>SW's
>ontological language is designed to describe how the data relates to the
>real world entities, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/.
>
>With sincere intentions to better your project,
>Azamat Abdoullaev
>EIS Encyclopedic Intelligent System LTD
>http://www.eis.com.cy
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
>To: "[[ontolog-forum]]" <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:14 AM
>Subject: [ontolog-forum] Last call documents for OWL 2
>specificationavailable - review and comments solicited
>
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> An you may know, I  co-chair the working group that is specifying the
>> next version of the OWL language. Because a number of  you have had
>> experience with working with (or wrestling with) OWL, I wonder if you
>> would consider reviewing our "last call" documents.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2008/10/10/seven_owl_2_drafts_published
>>
>> I am looking for comments on all aspects of the specification, and in
>> particular comments as to how understandable the specification is,
>> any comments on new features, as well as any inconsistencies or
>errors.
>>
>> Please send your comments to public-owl-comments@w3.org by January
>> 23, 2009.
>>
>> If you have any questions about this process, feel free to contact me
>> personally.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any efforts you put in to this, which I greatly
>> appreciate.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@ontolog.cim3.net
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
>> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net
>>
>

--
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe
Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de
Web  : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555

FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus


Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2008 20:03:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:26 GMT