I am going to use x type y a subClassOf b The "similar to mKR" thing is something extra -- a "hierarchy outline" like a table of contents -- a "picture" of the relations Dick McCullough Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done; knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://mKRmKE.org/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernhard Schandl" <bernhard.schandl@univie.ac.at> To: <semantic-web@w3.org> Cc: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@PioneerCA.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:37 PM Subject: Re: Thing and Class > Richard, > >> I have also thought of a good way to focus on my concerns. >> I will take a simple example, maybe the one offered by >> James Leigh, and do a complete individual hierarchy >> using all "type" and "subClassOf" links -- according to >> RDF/OWL, not according to mKR. >> >> I hope you won't mind if I use a notation similar to mKR >> to distinguish between "type" and "subClassOf" links. >> I plan to show >> x type y >> as (that's an "i:" prefix) >> y >> / i:x >> and >> x subClassOf y >> as >> y >> / x > > as an interested listener to your discussion, may I ask you to, > instead of your "similar to mKR" notation, just use the common RDF/OWL > vocabulary, i.e., > > x rdf:type y > a rdfs:subClassOf b > > to avoid confusion. These terms are understandable to (probably) all > readers of the list, and they are well defined. > >> I'll have the example done tomorrow. > > Looking forward to that. > > Best, Bernhard > > -- > Web of Data Practictioners Days: Oct 22-23, Vienna, Austria > <http://www.webofdata.info> > > -- > Bernhard Schandl > University of Vienna > Faculty of Computer Science > Department of Distributed and Multimedia Systems > web : http://www.cs.univie.ac.at/bernhard.schandl > phone : +43-1-4277-39621 > fax : +43-1-4277-39649 > >Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 07:49:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:30 GMT