On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 11:23 +0100, Dan Brickley wrote: > Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 16:41 +0200, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >> Benjamin, > >> > >> Thanks for the background. This is much appreciated. > >> > >> Here are some concrete gripes I have with the usage policy. > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Thank you for the input. We will review the suggestions and > > try to have answers by early next week. I will say that one > > challenge is finding the right balance between trying to maintain > > consistent usage of the logo ('more control by W3C') and promoting > > modifications to fit user needs in context ('less control by W3C'). > > I can see the case for both and are thinking about this question > > actively. > > Re usage and the idea of "disparage" in > > "The logo may not be used to disparage W3C, its Member organizations, > services, or products.", > > here's a concrete test case: do you consider > http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbri/428172848/ as disparaging W3C > products, services etc? I just think it's funny and honest, but I can > see how it might be read that way. The language provides room for interpretation. I hope we don't need even more legalese. There's plenty of room for parody-with-a-bite. _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260-9447Received on Thursday, 18 October 2007 20:40:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:53 GMT