Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 16:41 +0200, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >> Benjamin, >> >> Thanks for the background. This is much appreciated. >> >> Here are some concrete gripes I have with the usage policy. > > Hi Richard, > > Thank you for the input. We will review the suggestions and > try to have answers by early next week. I will say that one > challenge is finding the right balance between trying to maintain > consistent usage of the logo ('more control by W3C') and promoting > modifications to fit user needs in context ('less control by W3C'). > I can see the case for both and are thinking about this question > actively. Re usage and the idea of "disparage" in "The logo may not be used to disparage W3C, its Member organizations, services, or products.", here's a concrete test case: do you consider http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbri/428172848/ as disparaging W3C products, services etc? I just think it's funny and honest, but I can see how it might be read that way. cheers, DanReceived on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 10:24:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:10 GMT