W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Defining subsets of existing OWL / RDF-S vocabularies in another vocabulary?

From: <editor@content-wire.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:12:21 +0700
Message-ID: <00e401c80738$4a12d3d0$b30a010a@waralak>
To: "Golda Velez" <w3@webglimpse.org>, <semantic-web@w3.org>

>> you have authority to map an external schema to your internal one, if 
>> that
>> suits you
>> using xslt or other mapping tools
> Is there any place where mappings like this are collected/published, when 
> they
> are made public?  I have a feeling that simplified subsets of standard
> ontologies are going to be important for widespread use.
I dont think maps to internal schemas are made public, for a number of 
reasons, general internal schemas are not neat, or not standardized, or not 
meaningful, or confidential, or a combination of the above -  but it would 
be nice to have a set of samples
as a reference

Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 10:08:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:59 UTC