Re: Defining subsets of existing OWL / RDF-S vocabularies in another vocabulary?

Golda
>> you have authority to map an external schema to your internal one, if 
>> that
>> suits you
>> using xslt or other mapping tools
>
> Is there any place where mappings like this are collected/published, when 
> they
> are made public?  I have a feeling that simplified subsets of standard
> ontologies are going to be important for widespread use.
>
I dont think maps to internal schemas are made public, for a number of 
reasons, general internal schemas are not neat, or not standardized, or not 
meaningful, or confidential, or a combination of the above -  but it would 
be nice to have a set of samples
as a reference


PDM