On Wednesday 03 October 2007 02:37, editor@content-wire.com wrote: > > > However, I fear that defining an element that is residing in someone > > else's URI space is not okay, since I (e.g. http://www.heppnetz.de) have > > no authority of defining the semantics of an element that is within > > |http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/, even if I what I am saying is consistent with > > the authoritative definition of the given vocabulary element. | > > you have authority to map an external schema to your internal one, if that > suits you > using xslt or other mapping tools Is there any place where mappings like this are collected/published, when they are made public? I have a feeling that simplified subsets of standard ontologies are going to be important for widespread use. --GoldaReceived on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 19:43:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:10 GMT