W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > June 2007

Re: SWRL and OWL (or something else ?)

From: Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:54:22 -0400
Message-ID: <1e89d6a40706111154k3fdc03d3y9cdc61f5224f6db7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sarawh <sara.wh2005@gmail.com>
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Sara --

You wrote...

 I had planned to use Jena with Pellet, but Jena does not
support SWRL.  Now I am not really sure what is the best choice in case I
don't use SWRL ... are there other options available ? (except SWRL)that can
model more complex rules than OWL DL ?

Any advise on tools is also appreciated.

You may like to use the online system below.  You can use it to write and
run your rules directly, using a browser.

Some examples:

   www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/OwlResearchOnt.agent

   www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/OwlTest1.agent

   www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RelBioOntDefn3.agent

   www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RDFQueryLangComparison1.agent


www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/Oil-IndustrySupplyChain1Sqlmysql.agent

Hope this helps,    -- Adrian

Internet Business Logic
A Wiki for Executable Open Vocabulary English
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com    Shared use is free

Adrian Walker
Reengineering


On 6/10/07, Sarawh <sara.wh2005@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear All
>
> I have to model a domain in which not all rules can be translated into
> Description logic; therefore besides OWL DL , I am considering the use of
> SWRL.
>
> Initially ,  I had planned to use Jena with Pellet, but Jena does not
> support SWRL.  Now I am not really sure what is the best choice in case I
> don't use SWRL ... are there other options available ? (except SWRL)that
> can
> model more complex rules than OWL DL ?
>
> Any advise on tools is also appreciated.
>
> Thank you
> Sara
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/SWRL-and-OWL-%28or-something-else--%29-tf3896506.html#a11046257
> Sent from the w3.org - semantic-web mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 18:54:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:57 UTC