- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:27:22 +0200
- To: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 24.07.2007 11:51:56, Garret Wilson wrote: >name. (The same goes for v:extendedAddress.) Damn RDF! When can RDF just >go ahead and say that an rdf:List can hold literals? This irritates me >to no end. Why don't you just use a simple rdf:Seq? I don't think "closing" is too important in this case, and RDF containers are often easier to query than collections, too. Benjamin -- Benjamin Nowack http://bnode.org/
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 07:30:47 UTC