On 24.07.2007 11:51:56, Garret Wilson wrote: >name. (The same goes for v:extendedAddress.) Damn RDF! When can RDF just >go ahead and say that an rdf:List can hold literals? This irritates me >to no end. Why don't you just use a simple rdf:Seq? I don't think "closing" is too important in this case, and RDF containers are often easier to query than collections, too. Benjamin -- Benjamin Nowack http://bnode.org/Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 07:30:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:16 GMT