Here's an example of expressiveness using this 'implicit line number' idea in the triples: <hypothetical:H xmlns:hypothetical="http://www.discussion.org#" xml:base="http://site.com#" xmlns:doc="http://site.com#"> <hypothetical:Description hypothetical:about="theboy"> <doc:hit> <hypothetical:Description hypothetical:about="baseball" /> </doc:hit> </hypothetical:Description> <hypothetical:Description hypothetical:about="!1"> <doc:with> <hypothetical:Description hypothetical:about="baseballbat" /> </doc:with> <doc:on> <hypothetical:Description hypothetical:about="saturday" /> </doc:on> </hypothetical:Description> </hypothetical:H> We can add that the first triple is an instance of a class called 'action'. Whether problems arise from triples being instances of semantic classes is unknown. Also unknown is what happens to this concept as a formal description logic. Of additional interest are the recursive possibilities in the context of the above unknowns. Cheers, AdamReceived on Sunday, 4 February 2007 07:55:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:00 GMT