W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Question about ontology query languages... (please reply!!!)

From: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:38:40 -0500
Message-ID: <a25ac1f0704111138p1efb3dffy9cf783675ea0f2ed@mail.gmail.com>
To: semantic-web@w3.org
On 4/11/07, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> If you are building the ontology yourself, you could use a transitive
> role in the ontology (e.g., for is-a), then a standard sparql query
> will do the job (assuming that the store supports it).
> There are some query languages that support a transitive closure
> operator in the query, e.g., the one with Kowari/whatever it's called
> now

It's called Mulgara now (due to trademark issues with the Kowari name).

Once we get our SPARQL support running we'll probably try to create a
compatible superset with functions like transitivity included.  Until then,
you have to use the built in language of TQL (which works fine, but isn't a
standard like SPARQL is).

Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 18:39:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:56 UTC