W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2006

RE: rdf:Property used as rdf:object in a triple

From: Hans Teijgeler <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:47:23 +0100
To: "'Paul Gearon'" <gearon@ieee.org>
Cc: "'SW-forum'" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "'Chris Wilper'" <cwilper@cs.cornell.edu>, "Manola, Frank" <fmanola@acm.org>
Message-ID: <001301c700bf$68d34be0$6c7ba8c0@hans>
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your response! (and thanks as well to Chris and Frank).
Let me explain this with a simple example:


	John isInvolvedWith Jane

	Jane's father Pete givesApprovalTo that relationship

This means that the isInvolvedWith relationship is the rdf:object of the
predicate 'givesApprovalTo'.
We then also want to represent the owl:Restriction that Fathers approve such
relationships of their daughters (granted, it's a bit old-fashioned, but
it's just an example).
This example is not rare. Another one is:


	Nozzle N1 isWeldedTo Vessel V1

	that welded connection isInspectedBy John

I guess that I should start using reification, but quite honestly I am too
dumb to understand the text in [1]
Is reification at all possible in an OWL environment? It seems not to be the
Mind you, we define "templates" with Restrictions in OWL that will be used
to validate the zillions of instances of those templates in RDF. So for
example we define, using 15926 model lingo, a template for DirectConnection
of two PossibleIndividuals, and make sure, using owl:Restrictions, that any
instance of that template has an instance of PossibleIndividual at both
sides. These templates can be specialized by onProperty restrictions to, for
example, a template for welded connections that can only be between
instances of PossibleIndividual that can be welded at all.
I hope I haven't made this too complex :-)
Hans Teijgeler
ISO 15926 specialist
+31-72-509 2005
HYPERLINK "http://www.infowebml.ws/"www.InfowebML.ws 
HYPERLINK "mailto:hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl"hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl


From: Paul Gearon [mailto:gearon@ieee.org] 
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 23:56
To: Hans Teijgeler
Cc: SW-forum
Subject: Re: rdf:Property used as rdf:object in a triple

On Nov 4, 2006, at 6:25 AM, Hans Teijgeler wrote:

rdf:Property is a subClassOf rdfs:Resource, so syntactically a property
could be the rdf:object of a triple.
My question is, whether or not there is something against doing that from a
semantics/reasoning point of view.
Can anybody shed some light on this?

There's certainly no rule against it.  Reification requires it.  So does

As for semantics... you can get away with a lot in RDF.  But if you want to
keep things as valid OWL-Lite or OWL-DL then you have to be more careful, as
properties are treated a little differently to other resources.  Properties
only start getting back the "privileges" of other types of resources (like
classes) when you get up to OWL-Full.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.13.28/518 - Release Date: 04-Nov-06

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.13.28/518 - Release Date: 04-Nov-06
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 09:47:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:54 UTC