W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > September 2005

Re: Simple RDF parsers and in-memory stores

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@volcano.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:44:41 -0700
Message-ID: <015601c5c2d3$4479d410$0100000a@rhm8200>
To: "Jan Algermissen" <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>
Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>

I think the MKE system (click on link below my name)
would provide all the functionality that you want.
The basic interface would be Mtriples, with more
advanced features available by using the full MKR
language.  The Mtriple language includes
declarations and queries and variables.
The MKR language adds methods, n-ary relations,
context, and other goodies.

I am interpreting "simple" to mean standalone.
MKE is a self-contained package, implemented
using the Unicon programming language.

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jan Algermissen" <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>
To: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 2:27 AM
Subject: Simple RDF parsers and in-memory stores

> Hi,
> does anyone know about really simple RDF parser+storage  
> implementations? It is ok if the parser only handdles N3 or something  
> simpler (if such a format exists). The store does not need any QL  
> support.
> My requirement is to parse and store (in memory) small RDF  
> serializations with very limited possibilities to use libraries. Perl  
> (with standard installation libs) might be available, but maybe I  
> only bash in some cases.
> Doing someing simple in C and deploying the binary would propably  
> also work.
> Thanks for any pointers.
> Jan
> In case anybode knows:
> I recall that someone has parsed RDF with Python on a Nokia Series 60  
> phone, did that include the use of libraries or was the parser  
> written from scratch?
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 19:48:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:47 UTC