- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:00:54 -0400
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- CC: Jos de Bruijn <jos.debruijn@deri.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
Danny Ayers wrote: > snip > > > A little tangential question, do you think this suggests that the > "OntoWorker" kind of approach makes more sense, disposing of > scruffiness like literals and (XSD-styled) datatypes...or does the > pragmatic value of those things clearly outweigh having a more easily > manageable formal model? > "OntoWorker"???? (point me to a description) However, if you mean do I think we ought to replace all literals with URIs, then I don't (and I don't think using literals necessarily creates a less easily manageable formal model either). I had some more to say on this general subject in a message responding to some comments about the RDF Primer: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JanMar/0052.html I still think the verdict is out on this stuff. Cheers, --Frank
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 21:56:43 UTC