RE: Literals as subjects

Hi Graham and Danny,

We already use the XML Schema data types as owl:Class, see
http://www.infowebml.ws/description/ontology-for-data-model/ontology-for-dat
a-model.htm#XmlSchemaInformationRepresentation

Regards,
Hans

-----Original Message-----
From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Graham Klyne
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:07 PM
To: Danny Ayers
Cc: semantic-web at W3C
Subject: Literals as subjects


Danny Ayers wrote:
> (I must confess I'm not sure where the logicians are at on the general
> question - literals as subjects etc).

My understanding is that the logicians have no fundamental problem with
literals-as-subjects; cf. this response from Bijan Parsia about a question
of
mine to DAWG:
 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0051.ht
ml

#g

-- 
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact