W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2005

Literals as subjects

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:06:53 +0000
Message-ID: <43835E3D.4060500@ninebynine.org>
To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
CC: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org> 

Danny Ayers wrote:
> (I must confess I'm not sure where the logicians are at on the general
> question - literals as subjects etc).

My understanding is that the logicians have no fundamental problem with
literals-as-subjects; cf. this response from Bijan Parsia about a question of
mine to DAWG:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0051.html

#g

-- 
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2005 08:44:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:38 GMT