Literals as subjects

Danny Ayers wrote:
> (I must confess I'm not sure where the logicians are at on the general
> question - literals as subjects etc).

My understanding is that the logicians have no fundamental problem with
literals-as-subjects; cf. this response from Bijan Parsia about a question of
mine to DAWG:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0051.html

#g

-- 
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact

Received on Thursday, 24 November 2005 08:44:04 UTC