W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2005

Re: tagtriples

From: Jeremy Wong <50263336@student.cityu.edu.hk>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:25:57 +0800
To: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>, semantic-web@w3.org
Message-id: <003501c52fbc$9cf77f70$0401a8c0@wongkjo9u38gzb>

I like the user interface. It is simple to use. Any entailment does the 
tagtriples support?


Jeremy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Dawes" <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>
To: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 9:54 PM
Subject: tagtriples


>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to announce 'tagtriples' - a experimental format for
> exchanging and aggregating structured metadata. It's based on RDF
> ideas, but emphasises simplicity over precision.
>
> I've built it because I found that people at work struggled with
> publishing their data using RDF, and I wanted to see if giving them
> something simpler would yield more published structured data.
>
> In particular, it has these differences to RDF:
> - No URIs  (instead it uses 'tags' in the statements)
> - No Literals (everything is a tag)
> - Graphs are central to the model
> - No BNodes*
> - No collection types*
>
> I'd like to emphasise 'experimental' - this hasn't had much testing
> and although I have some ideas about resolving tag ambiguity issues,
> these haven't been implemented or proven yet.
>
> Sparse web page:
> http://tagtriples.sf.net/
>
> Thoughts about the format on my blog:
> http://www.phildawes.net/blog/
> http://www.phildawes.net/blog/category/semantic-web/tagtriples/
>
> I've written some tagtriples aggregator software (see sf page) with
> web based browsing and a sparql-like query language.
> I've recently deployed this at work, it scales to >1M triples with
> millisecond queries (should scale much higher, but not tested) and
> also supports very fast substring text querying using a suffix array.
>
> There's a (slow) demo of this software on my website:
> http://phildawes.net/temporary/tagtriples/tag/FrenchHorn
>
> (N.B. There's problems with the python binary crashing on the hosted
> server - if you get a 500 just refresh)
>
> Hope this is of interest to somebody!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
>
> * these decisions aren't set in stone
>
> 
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 15:30:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:45 UTC