Re: Tag ontology

I quite agree! Given the tool support I'd be aiming for, I think a specialised vocab with well-thought-out mappings is in order (at least, that's how i normally like to play it!)

-R

-- original message --
Subject:	Re: Tag ontology
From:	"Danny Ayers" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date:		2005-03-22 7:35 pm

PS. Richard - I'm not suggesting that you shouldn't design a vocab
specifically for tags, there would certainly be benefits to taking
that approach.You could always hook into SKOS-based vocabularies later
if you wanted.


-- 

http://dannyayers.com