Re: equivalence relation

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:51:11 +0100 Message-Id: <59438285a0c9a2a456e5689b256686eb@bblfish.net> To: semantic-web@w3.org · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:36:04 GMT

On 8 Feb 2005, at 19:17, Henry Story wrote:
> I suppose the simple solution would be to just write
>
> :relation rdfs:sameAs rdfs:sameAs .

of course I meant

   :relation owl:sameAs owl:sameAs .

> but I just found the place in the spec that mentions this
>
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#equivalentProperty-def>
>
> I should just say
>
> :relation owl:equivalentProperty rdfs:sameAs .

and here I meant

    :relation owl:equivalentProperty owl:sameAs .

> Thanks for pointing out those interesting quirks concerning
> complex properties.
>
> Henry Story