Agreed, it is rather sloppy to not say which dialect is meant, but, again, how is this different from K&R C/ANSI C; various C++ dialects (and libraries); various Java libraries, not to mention Sun vs Microsoft; and various ML dialects? Peter F. Patel-Schneider From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: Developers Guide to Semantic Web Toolkits for different Programming Languages Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:55:45 -0800 > > The counter-argument is that "Lisp" is a common shorthand for "Common > > Lisp", but it's not something that strikes me as correct in the > context > > of a document intended for public reference, particularly when there > > Yeah, I have written a lot of "Lisp" code in my life, and would quickly > flip the bozo bit on anyone nitpicky enough to say, 'technically it is > not called Lisp'. But for public reference docs, correctness is very > important. >Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 19:11:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:36:04 GMT