Re: Statements about statements -- Help needed!

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> Earlier drafts of EARL actually took this approach. While it is  
> functionally pretty similar, we moved away from it because it seemed 
> just  a tiny bit more complex to explain, and it really got quite 
> complicated if  you wanted to talk about a set of statements.

But in fact it's a rather straightforward means of 
acquiring/storing/integrating statements about statements into the RDF 
world? It was just ahead of its time for a bit.

Love.