W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Formal Semantics of OWL + RDF + SPARQL + SWRL

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:36:07 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd0512060936n68dc8730g67ae425dc520786d@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: adrianw@snet.net, semantic-web@w3.org

On 12/6/05, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:

> Well, even an RDF-only store *should* be respecting the RDF semantic, which
> does have some non-trivial inferences.

Fair point. There is one set of inferences I think could be useful to
have available in all SPARQL-capable stores -

?s ?p ?o .
?p rdf:type rdf:Property .

Being able to quickly check what predicates are in use in the store
seems to me potentially to offer a heuristic for asking "what do you
know about?"

> I agree that there is the possibility of allowing stores that have different
> functionality.  I do not believe, however, that the current vision of the
> Semantic Web supports a good way of providing this.

Do you have any (links to?) alternative visions which would be more suitable?



Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2005 17:36:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:48 UTC