- From: Robie, Jonathan <jonathan.robie@emc.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:18:31 +0000
- To: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>, "public-xsl-query@w3.org" <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
I apologize for missing this earlier. > The minutes say: >> DECISION: WG has agreed to refactor the grammar using the EnclosedExpr in >> the node constructors, > > *Computed* node constructors, that is. Yes. >> but in the case of the element constructor we shall not use it in the >> first argument because it cannot be an empty sequence. > > The same reasoning would apply to any 'name expression', i.e. also in > CompAttrConstructor and CompPIConstructor. Exactly. >> Consider the expressions Try, Catch, Validate, ExtensionExpr, Ordered and >> Unordered, CompDocConstructor, CompAttrConstructor, CompTextConstructor, >> CompCommentConstructor CompPIConstructor and Namespace > > [Note that this sentence appears in the body of the minutes, but not in the > collected decisions section at the top.] > > The WG decided to *consider* these expressions? What does that mean? I can > imagine it meaning "the WG decided to consider these expression at some > later time", or "this action item should be taken as applying to these > expressions", but either way, it conflicts with the first sentence of the > action item, which refers to "node constructors". Please clarify. Consider means that we decided to do this, and would like to ask you to make these changes to the grammar. I'm responding kind of late, if you can make these changes by Monday then I could make the corresponding text changes in time for the meeting, which would be really helpful. > Also, presumably "Namespace" should be "CompNamespaceConstructor"? Yes. Jonathan
Received on Saturday, 31 October 2015 18:19:18 UTC