- From: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:16:03 -0400
- To: public-xsl-query@w3.org
The minutes say: > DECISION: WG has agreed to refactor the grammar using the EnclosedExpr in > the node constructors, *Computed* node constructors, that is. > but in the case of the element constructor we shall not use it in the > first argument because it cannot be an empty sequence. The same reasoning would apply to any 'name expression', i.e. also in CompAttrConstructor and CompPIConstructor. > Consider the expressions Try, Catch, Validate, ExtensionExpr, Ordered and > Unordered, CompDocConstructor, CompAttrConstructor, CompTextConstructor, > CompCommentConstructor CompPIConstructor and Namespace [Note that this sentence appears in the body of the minutes, but not in the collected decisions section at the top.] The WG decided to *consider* these expressions? What does that mean? I can imagine it meaning "the WG decided to consider these expression at some later time", or "this action item should be taken as applying to these expressions", but either way, it conflicts with the first sentence of the action item, which refers to "node constructors". Please clarify. Also, presumably "Namespace" should be "CompNamespaceConstructor"? -Michael
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2015 03:17:11 UTC