W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xsd-databinding@w3.org > July 2008

Minutes: XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Telcon 15th July 2008

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:07:10 +0100
Message-ID: <EFFE16B1340E654082DCD17D16429533ABA95D@E03MVA3-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>

Minutes from yesterdays call are now available:

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/8/7/15-databinding-minutes.html

and copied below:  


                                                          - DRAFT -

                                  XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Working Group Teleconference

15 Jul 2008

   See also: IRC log

Attendees

   Present
          Jon Callaine (BT)
          George Cowe (Origo Services Limited)
          Paul Downey (BT)
          Yves Lafon (W3C)

   Regrets
   Chair
          pauld

   Scribe
          pauld

Contents

     * Topics
     * Summary of Action Items
     ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

   discussion of what's required to make progress

   pauld: need to reply to commenters, prepare issue list for Basic

   pauld: having decided to publish Advanced as a note, we're freer to put more descriptive content

   jonc: George, you need more feedback from the WG on the patterns you've prepared

   gcowe: that would be nice

   jonc: are we happy with the granularity of Advanced patterns?

   pauld: I'm mostly interested in Basic, are we comfortable with Advanced?

   jonc: I'd like a formal review of the Advanced patterns
   ... are we confident the Advanced patterns haven't broken the Basic patterns?

   pauld: the patterns and examples pages flag up incorrect attribution as red "status"
   http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/

   AttributeTypeReference and SequenceSequenceElement seem to be "basic" but detected as "advanced"

   http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/SequenceSequenceElement/

   SequenceSequenceElement should be Advanced

   AttributeTypeReference looks a little over engineered

   concerned there's no canonical example for GlobalElementComplexType

   pauld: worried we're going to have to rerun the test report
   ... if we make wholesale changes to examples such this

   <Yves> if we need to add patterns to Basic, we still have the possibility to do a short CR

   I don't think this example can be basic thanks to Decimal type

   I suspect that GlobalElementComplexType is, however, basic

   pauld: propose that the example put in the spec doesn't include Decimal

   gcowe: need to rebuild the test report and other pages, seem inconsistent

   <Yves> Yves is rebuilding the report

   <Yves> => reports done

   looking at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/report/all.html

   GlobalElementComplexType is a new pattern added by George

   pauld: doesn't introduce any new schema elements, but has been flagged as "Advanced"
   ... which flagging all examples as "Advanced"

   This pattern should be "Basic"!

   suddenly happy!

   I don't think there is an issue, this is in *all* of our WSDL examples echoAttributeTypeReference etc introduced by test
   framework, therefore "Basic"

   draws the WG's attention to: http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soapjms.html

   suggest we meet same time next week

   pauld: pick up a week today!
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 10:07:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:20:38 GMT