See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 26 February 2013
<scribe> ScribeNick: fjh
no announcements
Approve minutes from 19 February 2013
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2013Feb/att-0010/minutes-2013-02-19.html
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 19 February 2013 are approved.
PR results - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/XMLsecPR/results
<tlr> tlr: PR review completed; next steps within the team; suggest aiming at synchronized publication of Rec with IETF RFC.
fjh: have checked with IETF, should have number for RFC publication next week, but concerned if we delay REC too long
... need publication date soon in order to prepare drafts
... will check this offline
Correction to "XML Signature 1.1 Explanation of Changes", remove OCSPResponse : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2013Feb/0006.html
fjh: Please review the XML Security 1.1 references and acknowledgements and indicate on the list of you notice any editorial changes needed before Recommendation publication.
<scribe> New draft aligned with XML Security 1.1
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris/
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-09.txt
fjh: please review
proposed XML Security Algorithm Cross-Reference updates, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2013Feb/0001.html
fjh: please check these
... will make updates
fjh: we have another implementation of C14N2 from Jim Dovey, as he mentioned last week
scantor: can C14N2 work with Signature 1.1?
tlr: if so we can move C14N2 to Recommendation otherwise we cannot
... cannot work with arbitrary document subsets
... does C14N2 generate same subtree as C14N1
scantor: depends on the options used
... default behaviour is exclusive
fjh: it depends
tlr: can plug it in
fjh: given we have implementations suggest we can move forward to Recommendation
tlr: concerned that it will be confusing without corresponding Signature draft, suggest moving to Note
... do not want to send signal that this supersedes Exclusive Canonicalization
fjh: what about licensing obligations, potential further work
... do not want to stop work unnecessarily
scantor: is he implementing Signature 2.0
fjh: I think he is working on it
pdatta: I think Jim was looking for implementers guide to 1.1
fjh: he specifically needed streaming
pdatta: one can implement a subset of 1.1 in a streaming way, what most people do
fjh: suggest we follow up with Jim on whether use of C14N11 and Signature 1.1 would solve his needs, if he has guidance on streaming for these
... if so we are done and can publish C14N2 as a Note, otherwise we need to discuss plans for his implementation of Signature 2.0 and go from there
<scribe> ACTION: pdatta to check with Jim D re use of C14N1 in streaming way [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-931 - Check with Jim D re use of C14N1 in streaming way [on Pratik Datta - due 2013-03-05].
fjh: when do we need to draft new charter
tlr: suggest I send formal heads up to AC, plan to send draft of charter to WG, assume only maintenance charter unless we have new info from Jim
<jdovey> (Editors Note: Please note new information sent by Jim after call: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2013Feb/0012.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2013Feb/0014.html
Call for Consensus to publish 2.0 drafts as WG Notes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2013Feb/0000.html
fjh: CfC has completed, no objection, some support to move 2.0 documents to Notes
... need to resolve with Jim if there is any concern, and whether 1.1 C14N will work for him, otherwise will go forward with this plan
fjh: no open or pending actions apart from those assigned today
ISSUE-234?
<trackbot> ISSUE-234 -- Reference SP800-56A later in publication process if the latest version is no longer a draft -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/234
fjh: Still a draft, http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsSPs.html
... will not update unless it is published before our publication date
ISSUE-122
<trackbot> ISSUE-122 -- Explain peformance improvements and rationale, relationship to earlier work, document, benchmarks -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/122
fjh: this is moot if not moving 2.0 forward
pdatta: not working on this
close ISSUE-122
<trackbot> Closed ISSUE-122 Explain peformance improvements and rationale, relationship to earlier work, document, benchmarks.
none