W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Importing 1.0 while normatively referencing 1.1 ( LC-2544) ( LC-2561)

From: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 07:11:24 +0900
Message-ID: <CALvn5ECsNECr_B+=f0ztN815A2tMj0uB-0oSiec-SOQjX=pk5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Are there any advantages in not referencing to the Signature 1.1
schema from the Encryption 1.1 schema?

Regards,
Makoto

2011/9/5 Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu>:
> On Sep 4, 2011, at 2:37 AM, "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> wrote:
>>
>> I would argue that I'm a schema expert.  I think it  is very unusual
>> and has to be carefully explained.
>
> Well, I disagree so I guess the WG will have to decide. Since imports are not used in common practice to forcibly include schemas that apply to extension content, I don't see an argument for calling this "very unusual".
>>
>
>
> -- Scott



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
Received on Sunday, 4 September 2011 22:12:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 4 September 2011 22:12:21 GMT