W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > September 2010

RE: Canonical XML 2.0 Conformance Profiles

From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:04:47 -0400
To: "'Pratik Datta'" <pratik.datta@oracle.com>, "'Meiko Jensen'" <Meiko.Jensen@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Cc: <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <06c501cb4b9a$e16b3f20$a441bd60$@osu.edu>
> We are treading a fine line here.  If we mark too many features as MUST
> implement, we won't get many implementations, on the other hand if we have
> too many OPTIONAL features nobody will implement them and they will fall
> into the sidelines.

I think we probably have to wait on conformance discussions until we can get
feedback from potential implementers about what's likely to be painful or

-- Scott
Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 19:05:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:14 UTC