Please confirm agreement with resolution of SHA-384 XML Signature 1.1 Last Call comments (corrected)

(corrected confirmation request)

Makoto

As Last Call comments on XML Signature 1.1 you noted an ambiguity   
related to the SHA384 URI [1] [2]. This was noted as WG issues  
ISSUE-190 and ISSUE-191 [3] and also recorded as a single Last Call  
issue (LC-2376) [4].

In order to maintain backward compatibility the WG resolved the issue  
by updating the document to consistently use http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#sha384 
  as proposed [5] and minuted [6].

We included you in a message on March noting the resolution, but I   
have not heard any response [7]. I assume this means this resolution  
is acceptable, but for the record, can you please confirm that the
resolution is acceptable to you?  The latest Editors Draft has this  
correction [8].

Thank you.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair XML Security WG


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Mar/0052.html

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Mar/0029.html

[3] http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/190 and http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/191

[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmldsig-core1-20100204/2376

[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Mar/0074.html

[6] http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-xmlsec-minutes.html#item03

[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Mar/0081.html

[8] http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/Overview.html#sec-SHA-384

Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 15:54:38 UTC