W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > June 2010

RE: Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag

From: Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7393d551-2160-4bd4-8b01-ba163a61140f@default>
To: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
I have updated the C14N spec with this proposal.
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/c14n-20/  June 22, 2010

This should close my ACTION-596


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:57 PM
To: Pratik Datta; XMLSec WG Public List
Subject: RE: Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag

> I remember that we had discussed this, but did we agree on this proposal ?

I think Thomas had expressed a concern about whether we needed to bother
exposing all of the backward compatibility options, and that it was better
to define just "the right things" for 2.0.

-- Scott
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 17:18:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:14 UTC